<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arizona Motorsports Park shut down</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rassoc.com/gregr/weblog/2004/01/22/arizona-motorsports-park-shut-down/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rassoc.com/gregr/weblog/2004/01/22/arizona-motorsports-park-shut-down/</link>
	<description>Musings on just about everything.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kenny Palmer</title>
		<link>http://www.rassoc.com/gregr/weblog/2004/01/22/arizona-motorsports-park-shut-down/#comment-47740</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenny Palmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 19:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregrphoto.com/rassoc/gregr/weblog/2004/01/22/arizona-motorsports-park-shut-down/#comment-47740</guid>
		<description>I just ran across this thread and had to chime in. I think the situation sucks for Mr. Maloney. they couldnt limit the "times" or days a car can run on the track? no compromises? just a big middle finger and close your track. unbelievable..

Just goes to show what a bunch of old hags and golfers will do. No doubt those folks at the adjacent course had some say in the tracks demise. Too bad they are to old to realize facilities like this help to prevent reckless driving and street racing.

I was out in the area on my MX bike the other weekend and had to peer through the chainlink fence at what looks like a nice place. Wish i would have had a chance to ride it!

? - is there no chance of "limited" reopen.. special events? DB requirements on vehicles?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just ran across this thread and had to chime in. I think the situation sucks for Mr. Maloney. they couldnt limit the &#8220;times&#8221; or days a car can run on the track? no compromises? just a big middle finger and close your track. unbelievable..</p>
<p>Just goes to show what a bunch of old hags and golfers will do. No doubt those folks at the adjacent course had some say in the tracks demise. Too bad they are to old to realize facilities like this help to prevent reckless driving and street racing.</p>
<p>I was out in the area on my MX bike the other weekend and had to peer through the chainlink fence at what looks like a nice place. Wish i would have had a chance to ride it!</p>
<p>? - is there no chance of &#8220;limited&#8221; reopen.. special events? DB requirements on vehicles?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Cozzolino</title>
		<link>http://www.rassoc.com/gregr/weblog/2004/01/22/arizona-motorsports-park-shut-down/#comment-46775</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Cozzolino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 21:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregrphoto.com/rassoc/gregr/weblog/2004/01/22/arizona-motorsports-park-shut-down/#comment-46775</guid>
		<description>Problem is, 99.9% of the politicians are too old to appreciate anything we younger people enjoy doing.

They don't want us racing in the street and at the same time take away safe places to do it.

What a joke the Maricopa County Board of Stupidvisors are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Problem is, 99.9% of the politicians are too old to appreciate anything we younger people enjoy doing.</p>
<p>They don&#8217;t want us racing in the street and at the same time take away safe places to do it.</p>
<p>What a joke the Maricopa County Board of Stupidvisors are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shopper Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.rassoc.com/gregr/weblog/2004/01/22/arizona-motorsports-park-shut-down/#comment-9207</link>
		<dc:creator>Shopper Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregrphoto.com/rassoc/gregr/weblog/2004/01/22/arizona-motorsports-park-shut-down/#comment-9207</guid>
		<description>Wow. Walczinski, that's some heavy stuff. Anyway, Kirk Schenck does have a point there. However, I think the main issue in here is the battle between the developers, few residents and the AMP, of which, was the result of the incompetence of the planning and zoning commission. And I really think that the city must learn from this mistake to avoid future issues as this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Walczinski, that&#8217;s some heavy stuff. Anyway, Kirk Schenck does have a point there. However, I think the main issue in here is the battle between the developers, few residents and the AMP, of which, was the result of the incompetence of the planning and zoning commission. And I really think that the city must learn from this mistake to avoid future issues as this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dayton Beck</title>
		<link>http://www.rassoc.com/gregr/weblog/2004/01/22/arizona-motorsports-park-shut-down/#comment-1114</link>
		<dc:creator>Dayton Beck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 21:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregrphoto.com/rassoc/gregr/weblog/2004/01/22/arizona-motorsports-park-shut-down/#comment-1114</guid>
		<description>I couldn't agree with you more Carter!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regarding Ms. Sparacino, realize that many more people besides Mr. Maloney were affected by the closing of AMP.  It provided a SAFE atmosphere for all motorsports enthusiasts do enjoy their costly investments.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Especially with an Airforce Base Adjacent to it! AMP was FAR from this quiet edge of town you speak of!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree with you more Carter!</p>
<p>Regarding Ms. Sparacino, realize that many more people besides Mr. Maloney were affected by the closing of AMP.  It provided a SAFE atmosphere for all motorsports enthusiasts do enjoy their costly investments.  </p>
<p>Especially with an Airforce Base Adjacent to it! AMP was FAR from this quiet edge of town you speak of!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carter Stapleton</title>
		<link>http://www.rassoc.com/gregr/weblog/2004/01/22/arizona-motorsports-park-shut-down/#comment-1113</link>
		<dc:creator>Carter Stapleton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 00:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregrphoto.com/rassoc/gregr/weblog/2004/01/22/arizona-motorsports-park-shut-down/#comment-1113</guid>
		<description>You know, this is too little too late, Ms Sparacino.  If you moved 2 yrs ago then you should well have checked with your city  AND those cities around you to see what was up as relates to your area. Is your area close to a tourist attraction within a few miles?  Do people clammor to the area for weekly happenings or monthly happenings? Is your little Quite Piece of the Country trying all they can to attract MORE $$ and MORE people to the area?  Did you investigate that?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;An area with land abutting a major population is fair game for real estate development that provides for the highest and best use of the land...real estate 101.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And, Race tracks don't happen over night. LOTS of planning and debating, redrawing, achitects, lawyers, etc have to go before a city council before somthing of this magnitude is built. ALWAYS check back for at least a YEAR of City Council minutes before pinning your future on Quietude outside a large metro area.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you are on the outskirts of a major population area, and I believe you must be, then you MUST expect your 'quiet country home' to be Encroached upon.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is the very people who move to the edge of major metropolitan areas who scream loudest when 'progress' inches toward them...why? because they expect things to stay the way they are and nothing does!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you wanted a Quiet country home then you should have moved WELL away from Metropolitan areas.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;After all, they don't built race tracks in the middle of nowhere, they build them on the edge of where life happens, why?  Because that's where the money is.  No money, no race track...let that be your guide when you move the next time, IF you are able to sell...when you expect all the city conveniences moments away or at worse, an hours drive, but you don't want the city coming to your door.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, what happens to real estate in Texas and elsewhere has been in the news a lot over the last 3-4 years as highest and best use decides what is the highest and best use of the earth under your feet.  YOU may  think a little spread of land with a new brick home is perfect for you...but the city KNOWS that little bit of land between you and that major population area is PERFECT for Revenue!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you have pinned your hopes, dreams and future on this move to the Quite Country but didn't do due diligence, then you have NO reason to complain...with real estate being the single largest investment a person makes, they really should spend a LOT of time learning about Location, Location, Location.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, this is too little too late, Ms Sparacino.  If you moved 2 yrs ago then you should well have checked with your city  AND those cities around you to see what was up as relates to your area. Is your area close to a tourist attraction within a few miles?  Do people clammor to the area for weekly happenings or monthly happenings? Is your little Quite Piece of the Country trying all they can to attract MORE $$ and MORE people to the area?  Did you investigate that?</p>
<p>An area with land abutting a major population is fair game for real estate development that provides for the highest and best use of the land&#8230;real estate 101.</p>
<p>And, Race tracks don&#8217;t happen over night. LOTS of planning and debating, redrawing, achitects, lawyers, etc have to go before a city council before somthing of this magnitude is built. ALWAYS check back for at least a YEAR of City Council minutes before pinning your future on Quietude outside a large metro area.</p>
<p>If you are on the outskirts of a major population area, and I believe you must be, then you MUST expect your &#8216;quiet country home&#8217; to be Encroached upon.  </p>
<p>It is the very people who move to the edge of major metropolitan areas who scream loudest when &#8216;progress&#8217; inches toward them&#8230;why? because they expect things to stay the way they are and nothing does!</p>
<p>If you wanted a Quiet country home then you should have moved WELL away from Metropolitan areas.</p>
<p>After all, they don&#8217;t built race tracks in the middle of nowhere, they build them on the edge of where life happens, why?  Because that&#8217;s where the money is.  No money, no race track&#8230;let that be your guide when you move the next time, IF you are able to sell&#8230;when you expect all the city conveniences moments away or at worse, an hours drive, but you don&#8217;t want the city coming to your door.  </p>
<p>Also, what happens to real estate in Texas and elsewhere has been in the news a lot over the last 3-4 years as highest and best use decides what is the highest and best use of the earth under your feet.  YOU may  think a little spread of land with a new brick home is perfect for you&#8230;but the city KNOWS that little bit of land between you and that major population area is PERFECT for Revenue!</p>
<p>If you have pinned your hopes, dreams and future on this move to the Quite Country but didn&#8217;t do due diligence, then you have NO reason to complain&#8230;with real estate being the single largest investment a person makes, they really should spend a LOT of time learning about Location, Location, Location.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy Sparacino</title>
		<link>http://www.rassoc.com/gregr/weblog/2004/01/22/arizona-motorsports-park-shut-down/#comment-1112</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Sparacino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 16:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregrphoto.com/rassoc/gregr/weblog/2004/01/22/arizona-motorsports-park-shut-down/#comment-1112</guid>
		<description>We are now facing a racetrack being built less than a mile from our quite country home which we just moved to 2 years ago.. we have neighbors like us who moved here for the piece and quite and slower country life. We have all invested a lot of money into our properties and homes. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Its not that I think racetracks shouldn't be allowed anywhere...but build them where residential housing isnt there already! It seems to me already existing housing should over ride someone coming in after the fact and building something that would lower property values and create a lot of noise! Don't allow them in a area of residential housing that already exist... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have to tell you, we are not happy about this one being built and hope it will not happen! Texas has one of these already in Cesson, Texas...less than a 2 hour drive from here...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Its easy to say let them build it.. when its not your home and your property value that will suffer from it!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The builder says this is a life long dream,,,surely ONE mans dream shouldn't over ride the dreams of MANY....  that were here first! Pick another spot without homes...This is turning our dreams into a nightmare!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank You....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are now facing a racetrack being built less than a mile from our quite country home which we just moved to 2 years ago.. we have neighbors like us who moved here for the piece and quite and slower country life. We have all invested a lot of money into our properties and homes. </p>
<p>Its not that I think racetracks shouldn&#8217;t be allowed anywhere&#8230;but build them where residential housing isnt there already! It seems to me already existing housing should over ride someone coming in after the fact and building something that would lower property values and create a lot of noise! Don&#8217;t allow them in a area of residential housing that already exist&#8230; </p>
<p>I have to tell you, we are not happy about this one being built and hope it will not happen! Texas has one of these already in Cesson, Texas&#8230;less than a 2 hour drive from here&#8230;</p>
<p>Its easy to say let them build it.. when its not your home and your property value that will suffer from it!</p>
<p>The builder says this is a life long dream,,,surely ONE mans dream shouldn&#8217;t over ride the dreams of MANY&#8230;.  that were here first! Pick another spot without homes&#8230;This is turning our dreams into a nightmare!</p>
<p>Thank You&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jody H</title>
		<link>http://www.rassoc.com/gregr/weblog/2004/01/22/arizona-motorsports-park-shut-down/#comment-1111</link>
		<dc:creator>Jody H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 22:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregrphoto.com/rassoc/gregr/weblog/2004/01/22/arizona-motorsports-park-shut-down/#comment-1111</guid>
		<description>I stumbled up this blog while doing a search on AMP to see if anything new was happening.  It's been quite some time since I sat in on those board meetings when AMP's special use permit was being reviewed.  I couldn't agree more with John's conclusions.  These were the same points I kept arguing with friends &#038; colleagues in support of the track.  The written application plainy stated exactly how the track was intended to be used.  Yes - AMP's original lawyer did make a couple verbal contradictions to the info in the app - but if the board had READ THE APPLICATION, they would have realized this, and should certainly have questioned any discrepancy they may have noticed before issuing the permit!!!!  But the fact is - they never had any problems with it until they came under pressure from the nearby community and (of primary importance here) the land developers who had built said community and who had plans to continue building right up to the edge of the track.  It was then and only then that the excuse of 'being mislead' was used to bring AMPs permit into review.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the hearings - noise was only the first issue of complaint.  But when AMP took it upon themselves to conduct extensive, independent sound level tests (at their own expense) it was found that the ambient noise levels in the surrounding communities was higher than that generated by the track!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This didn't slow down AMP's attackers, who then turned 90 degrees and said that it wasn't the sound level that was the problem, but rather the 'quality of sound' (whatever the bleep that means).  When that issue was addressed, their argument changed to the issue of proper building permits not being obtained.  As each argument was countered they'd come up with two more complaints to replace them.  The pattern... no matter what AMP did, no matter how far they bent over backwards - the only way the community would be appeased would be if they disappeared.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Since then - at the time of this writing - the land developers that formed the spine of the assault on AMP have finished constructing homes butting right up to the track (and the air force base as well).  Think they didn't step plans up a notch in anticipation of AMP's 2nd permit app?  Think again.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I had the opportunity to run &#038; race that track a few times (motorcycling), and it was the best thing to happen to motorsports enthusiasts in the area for as long as I can remember.  But thanks to greedy, unscrupulous land developers, a spineless and incompetent planning &#038; zoning commission, and a handful of residents with nothing more to do than cause trouble and bitch about gout... we lose it all.  And the owner - Maloney - loses alot more.  I know he put at least 6 million into the initial construction of the track.  I'd hate to think how much money he has into it now, combined with legal fees.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So very sad.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stumbled up this blog while doing a search on AMP to see if anything new was happening.  It&#8217;s been quite some time since I sat in on those board meetings when AMP&#8217;s special use permit was being reviewed.  I couldn&#8217;t agree more with John&#8217;s conclusions.  These were the same points I kept arguing with friends &#038; colleagues in support of the track.  The written application plainy stated exactly how the track was intended to be used.  Yes - AMP&#8217;s original lawyer did make a couple verbal contradictions to the info in the app - but if the board had READ THE APPLICATION, they would have realized this, and should certainly have questioned any discrepancy they may have noticed before issuing the permit!!!!  But the fact is - they never had any problems with it until they came under pressure from the nearby community and (of primary importance here) the land developers who had built said community and who had plans to continue building right up to the edge of the track.  It was then and only then that the excuse of &#8216;being mislead&#8217; was used to bring AMPs permit into review.  </p>
<p>In the hearings - noise was only the first issue of complaint.  But when AMP took it upon themselves to conduct extensive, independent sound level tests (at their own expense) it was found that the ambient noise levels in the surrounding communities was higher than that generated by the track!</p>
<p>This didn&#8217;t slow down AMP&#8217;s attackers, who then turned 90 degrees and said that it wasn&#8217;t the sound level that was the problem, but rather the &#8216;quality of sound&#8217; (whatever the bleep that means).  When that issue was addressed, their argument changed to the issue of proper building permits not being obtained.  As each argument was countered they&#8217;d come up with two more complaints to replace them.  The pattern&#8230; no matter what AMP did, no matter how far they bent over backwards - the only way the community would be appeased would be if they disappeared.</p>
<p>Since then - at the time of this writing - the land developers that formed the spine of the assault on AMP have finished constructing homes butting right up to the track (and the air force base as well).  Think they didn&#8217;t step plans up a notch in anticipation of AMP&#8217;s 2nd permit app?  Think again.  </p>
<p>I had the opportunity to run &#038; race that track a few times (motorcycling), and it was the best thing to happen to motorsports enthusiasts in the area for as long as I can remember.  But thanks to greedy, unscrupulous land developers, a spineless and incompetent planning &#038; zoning commission, and a handful of residents with nothing more to do than cause trouble and bitch about gout&#8230; we lose it all.  And the owner - Maloney - loses alot more.  I know he put at least 6 million into the initial construction of the track.  I&#8217;d hate to think how much money he has into it now, combined with legal fees.</p>
<p>So very sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becca O'Malley</title>
		<link>http://www.rassoc.com/gregr/weblog/2004/01/22/arizona-motorsports-park-shut-down/#comment-1110</link>
		<dc:creator>Becca O'Malley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 22:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregrphoto.com/rassoc/gregr/weblog/2004/01/22/arizona-motorsports-park-shut-down/#comment-1110</guid>
		<description>I live less then a quarter mile from the base and yes the f-16's are loud but it's also a wonderful sound.  You get used to it as you would with the track noise.  I know me personally, I would LOVE for that track to reopen..both my boyfriend and myself ride motorcycles and it would be close and I have heard that it's a phenominal track.  The people that were complaining about the noise where the same people complaining that Luke was too loud, but here's the thing their house were built within the past 5 - 10 years the base has been there much much longer then those house and I know that when I moved into my place I was to sign a release in understanding the noise was there and I was in a flight path.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hope there is something we can do to reopen this track.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live less then a quarter mile from the base and yes the f-16&#8217;s are loud but it&#8217;s also a wonderful sound.  You get used to it as you would with the track noise.  I know me personally, I would LOVE for that track to reopen..both my boyfriend and myself ride motorcycles and it would be close and I have heard that it&#8217;s a phenominal track.  The people that were complaining about the noise where the same people complaining that Luke was too loud, but here&#8217;s the thing their house were built within the past 5 - 10 years the base has been there much much longer then those house and I know that when I moved into my place I was to sign a release in understanding the noise was there and I was in a flight path.</p>
<p>I hope there is something we can do to reopen this track.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Zoumbaris</title>
		<link>http://www.rassoc.com/gregr/weblog/2004/01/22/arizona-motorsports-park-shut-down/#comment-1109</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Zoumbaris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2004 02:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregrphoto.com/rassoc/gregr/weblog/2004/01/22/arizona-motorsports-park-shut-down/#comment-1109</guid>
		<description>Luke Air Force base will not be shutting down for a long time. It's the largest fighter pilot traing base in the world. It's where you go to learn to fly the f16. I know because my wife is a dentist there. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would also give my left nut for them to open AMP back up.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luke Air Force base will not be shutting down for a long time. It&#8217;s the largest fighter pilot traing base in the world. It&#8217;s where you go to learn to fly the f16. I know because my wife is a dentist there. </p>
<p>I would also give my left nut for them to open AMP back up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk Schenck</title>
		<link>http://www.rassoc.com/gregr/weblog/2004/01/22/arizona-motorsports-park-shut-down/#comment-1108</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk Schenck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 03:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregrphoto.com/rassoc/gregr/weblog/2004/01/22/arizona-motorsports-park-shut-down/#comment-1108</guid>
		<description>&lt;br&gt;I had the pleasure to drive at AMP in a Shifter Kart. It is the best track I have ever raced on. I have driven all 3 tracks at Firebird, California Speedway, PIR, Las Vegas Motor Speedway outer Road Course and PKRA.&lt;br&gt; I feel the Board of Supervisors fell asleep at the wheel by failing to see the intended purpose. The permit process requires extensive documentation regarding the application request. The answer to the question regarding Street Legal only was never spelled out in writing nor was it made a stipulation to maintain the permit. It is the Boards responsibility to see the pig through the wedding dress. Every developer that stands before that board is attempting to pull the wool over their eyes. It is a part of their job. It is also the Boards responsibility to inform the applicant of reasons that deem revocation. If he financed this project, the bank would have viewed the permit as an assurance that they would not stand in the way of the applicant's business plan.The Board failed to stand behind their commitment to the applicant. Not based on any of the documents submitted in the application process but when a video containing one response to a question concurred to yes Street Legal only. In review the board did not outline additional requirement or limitation to sound, time or day of week that we forgot to make clear the first time. They just spinelessly tried to direct attention to the track owners “misrepresentation”.&lt;br&gt; I have not been there but I am told that there is a Motocross track next door. I could not hear it. I feel that the owner made every effort to find the best property within 75 miles of Phoenix. The property has limitations to what can be built on it due to the risk of air planes crashing into it and the noise pollution  of  more than 110db. It is an ideal location for a loud business. It is not ideal for home owners seeking piece and quiet. Those seeking revocation should be forced to buy him out. They agreed to the plan than changed their mind. The track owner should not bear the burden for their mistakes and oversights.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In my neighborhood in Tempe I live two blocks from the train tracks. At several times during the night the train rides its horn continuously. Is it loud? Yes. Is it necessary at 10,2, and 4AM? No. Was it here before me ?Yes. Can I hear it at any other time during the day? No. I live 2 miles from the 60 and 10. I can hear the cars and trucks if I am standing out side at 3 AM. Can I hear it during the day? No. Am I trying to shut down the Train, The Air Port or the Freeway? No. Was my house priced accordingly? Yes. What about all the traffic that roars down Camelback, are they trying to have speed humps installed? The weather in Phoenix prevents you from having your windows open during the DAY most of the year.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Laguna Seca is on federal land to the best of my knowledge. I was stationed at Fort Ord and entered the track directly through a gate 100 feet from the final turn. Since Fort Ord has closed I do not know if things changed. Laguna Seca is another example of building right next to a loud military base, range road to be exact. The geography is the best part of Laguna Seca. With the exception of the top of the corkscrew hill it is contained in a valley higher than the surrounding homes. I would think that the rental cost is the biggest issue for scheduling events. Correct me if I am wrong. The Barber driving school runs loud open wheel cars 5 days a week.&lt;br&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the pleasure to drive at AMP in a Shifter Kart. It is the best track I have ever raced on. I have driven all 3 tracks at Firebird, California Speedway, PIR, Las Vegas Motor Speedway outer Road Course and PKRA.<br />
<br /> I feel the Board of Supervisors fell asleep at the wheel by failing to see the intended purpose. The permit process requires extensive documentation regarding the application request. The answer to the question regarding Street Legal only was never spelled out in writing nor was it made a stipulation to maintain the permit. It is the Boards responsibility to see the pig through the wedding dress. Every developer that stands before that board is attempting to pull the wool over their eyes. It is a part of their job. It is also the Boards responsibility to inform the applicant of reasons that deem revocation. If he financed this project, the bank would have viewed the permit as an assurance that they would not stand in the way of the applicant&#8217;s business plan.The Board failed to stand behind their commitment to the applicant. Not based on any of the documents submitted in the application process but when a video containing one response to a question concurred to yes Street Legal only. In review the board did not outline additional requirement or limitation to sound, time or day of week that we forgot to make clear the first time. They just spinelessly tried to direct attention to the track owners “misrepresentation”.<br />
<br /> I have not been there but I am told that there is a Motocross track next door. I could not hear it. I feel that the owner made every effort to find the best property within 75 miles of Phoenix. The property has limitations to what can be built on it due to the risk of air planes crashing into it and the noise pollution  of  more than 110db. It is an ideal location for a loud business. It is not ideal for home owners seeking piece and quiet. Those seeking revocation should be forced to buy him out. They agreed to the plan than changed their mind. The track owner should not bear the burden for their mistakes and oversights.</p>
<p>In my neighborhood in Tempe I live two blocks from the train tracks. At several times during the night the train rides its horn continuously. Is it loud? Yes. Is it necessary at 10,2, and 4AM? No. Was it here before me ?Yes. Can I hear it at any other time during the day? No. I live 2 miles from the 60 and 10. I can hear the cars and trucks if I am standing out side at 3 AM. Can I hear it during the day? No. Am I trying to shut down the Train, The Air Port or the Freeway? No. Was my house priced accordingly? Yes. What about all the traffic that roars down Camelback, are they trying to have speed humps installed? The weather in Phoenix prevents you from having your windows open during the DAY most of the year.</p>
<p>Laguna Seca is on federal land to the best of my knowledge. I was stationed at Fort Ord and entered the track directly through a gate 100 feet from the final turn. Since Fort Ord has closed I do not know if things changed. Laguna Seca is another example of building right next to a loud military base, range road to be exact. The geography is the best part of Laguna Seca. With the exception of the top of the corkscrew hill it is contained in a valley higher than the surrounding homes. I would think that the rental cost is the biggest issue for scheduling events. Correct me if I am wrong. The Barber driving school runs loud open wheel cars 5 days a week.<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
