Comments on: Collaboration and TrackBack/Pingback http://www.rassoc.com/gregr/weblog/2002/12/31/collaboration-and-trackbackpingback/ Musings on just about everything. Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:23:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: eZpress http://www.rassoc.com/gregr/weblog/2002/12/31/collaboration-and-trackbackpingback/#comment-98 eZpress Sun, 14 May 2006 19:04:24 +0000 http://www.gregrphoto.com/rassoc/gregr/weblog/2002/12/31/collaboration-and-trackbackpingback/#comment-98 Pingback Pingback

]]> By: Scott Hanselman http://www.rassoc.com/gregr/weblog/2002/12/31/collaboration-and-trackbackpingback/#comment-97 Scott Hanselman Fri, 12 Nov 2004 22:29:35 +0000 http://www.gregrphoto.com/rassoc/gregr/weblog/2002/12/31/collaboration-and-trackbackpingback/#comment-97 That's some serious comment spam you've got going there. I've got a CAPTCHA solution posted on my site. That’s some serious comment spam you’ve got going there. I’ve got a CAPTCHA solution posted on my site.

]]> By: TIG's Corner http://www.rassoc.com/gregr/weblog/2002/12/31/collaboration-and-trackbackpingback/#comment-96 TIG's Corner Sat, 25 Jan 2003 15:22:27 +0000 http://www.gregrphoto.com/rassoc/gregr/weblog/2002/12/31/collaboration-and-trackbackpingback/#comment-96 Pingback Pingback

]]> By: as days pass by: Pingbacks and trackbacks and implementation http://www.rassoc.com/gregr/weblog/2002/12/31/collaboration-and-trackbackpingback/#comment-95 as days pass by: Pingbacks and trackbacks and implementation Thu, 09 Jan 2003 15:31:59 +0000 http://www.gregrphoto.com/rassoc/gregr/weblog/2002/12/31/collaboration-and-trackbackpingback/#comment-95 Pingback Pingback

]]> By: While I Was Out. http://www.rassoc.com/gregr/weblog/2002/12/31/collaboration-and-trackbackpingback/#comment-94 While I Was Out. Mon, 06 Jan 2003 23:18:57 +0000 http://www.gregrphoto.com/rassoc/gregr/weblog/2002/12/31/collaboration-and-trackbackpingback/#comment-94 The holidays (and associated downtime) are over and its back to business. This is a summary of the interesting and noteworthy news and posts that where made while I was out....[<a href='http://www.mplode.com/tima/archives/000183.html' rel="nofollow">more</a>] The holidays (and associated downtime) are over and its back to business. This is a summary of the interesting and noteworthy news and posts that where made while I was out….[more]

]]> By: Gerg Reinacker http://www.rassoc.com/gregr/weblog/2002/12/31/collaboration-and-trackbackpingback/#comment-93 Gerg Reinacker Wed, 01 Jan 2003 17:30:13 +0000 http://www.gregrphoto.com/rassoc/gregr/weblog/2002/12/31/collaboration-and-trackbackpingback/#comment-93 Looks like <a href="http://www.pocketsoap.com/weblog/2002/12/31.html#a921" rel="nofollow">Simon</a> is working on a pingback implementation for Radio. Excellent! Looks like Simon is working on a pingback implementation for Radio. Excellent!

]]> By: Trackback Threading http://www.rassoc.com/gregr/weblog/2002/12/31/collaboration-and-trackbackpingback/#comment-92 Trackback Threading Tue, 31 Dec 2002 22:51:43 +0000 http://www.gregrphoto.com/rassoc/gregr/weblog/2002/12/31/collaboration-and-trackbackpingback/#comment-92 My guess is that the next logical step is trackback threading. This represents a small challenge for those of us who comingle trackbacks and direct comments, but I'm sure that this can be overcome. Amusingly, trackback is to linkbackparser as Mark's...[<a href='http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/1071.html' rel="nofollow">more</a>] My guess is that the next logical step is trackback threading. This represents a small challenge for those of us who comingle trackbacks and direct comments, but I’m sure that this can be overcome. Amusingly, trackback is to linkbackparser as Mark’s…[more]

]]> By: Greg Reinacker http://www.rassoc.com/gregr/weblog/2002/12/31/collaboration-and-trackbackpingback/#comment-91 Greg Reinacker Tue, 31 Dec 2002 22:41:32 +0000 http://www.gregrphoto.com/rassoc/gregr/weblog/2002/12/31/collaboration-and-trackbackpingback/#comment-91 Ok, a quick scan of my server logs shows that it was indeed a GET that was failing. I modified my implementation to accept either GET or POST...can you try again? Ok, a quick scan of my server logs shows that it was indeed a GET that was failing. I modified my implementation to accept either GET or POST…can you try again?

]]> By: Greg Reinacker http://www.rassoc.com/gregr/weblog/2002/12/31/collaboration-and-trackbackpingback/#comment-90 Greg Reinacker Tue, 31 Dec 2002 22:22:02 +0000 http://www.gregrphoto.com/rassoc/gregr/weblog/2002/12/31/collaboration-and-trackbackpingback/#comment-90 Sam, are you using HTTP GET? My implementation only supports POST. The spec said GET is being deprecated (tomorrow ;-), but I could implement it if it's still in widespread use... Sam, are you using HTTP GET? My implementation only supports POST. The spec said GET is being deprecated (tomorrow ;-), but I could implement it if it’s still in widespread use…

]]> By: Sam Ruby http://www.rassoc.com/gregr/weblog/2002/12/31/collaboration-and-trackbackpingback/#comment-89 Sam Ruby Tue, 31 Dec 2002 22:08:10 +0000 http://www.gregrphoto.com/rassoc/gregr/weblog/2002/12/31/collaboration-and-trackbackpingback/#comment-89 The tags in the response got eaten. Let's try again<br /><br /> <?xml version="1.0"?><response><error>1</error><message>URL is required for trac<BR>kback</message></response> The tags in the response got eaten. Let’s try again

<?xml version=”1.0″?><response><error>1</error><message>URL is required for trac
kback</message></response>

]]>